EHX Small Stone vs MXR Phase 90

EHX Small Stone wins for lush, deep phasing with more pronounced character — its four-stage analog phaser produces a thicker, wider sweep that is more dramatically audible in a mix. MXR Phase 90 wins for versatility, reliability, and compatibility with a broader range of musical contexts — its more moderate phase character sits better in a band mix without overwhelming other instruments.

Modulation

EHX Small Stone

£79

The Electro-Harmonix analog phase shifter — a 4-stage OTA-based design with a Color switch that adds resonance feedback for a more dramatic sweep. A different character from the Phase 90: wider, more enveloping, with a deeper sweep range.

Best for

Rock, blues, psych — the alternative to the Phase 90, with a wider, more enveloping phase sweep and the Color switch resonance option for dramatic effects

Modulation

MXR Phase 90

£99

The iconic 4-stage FET phase shifter in an orange box. Single Speed knob controls the sweep rate — Eddie Van Halen used it on every Van Halen album. Two internal versions: Script Logo (smoother, vintage) and Block Logo (brighter, more modern).

Best for

Classic rock, hard rock — the iconic one-knob phase shifter that defined 1970s and 1980s electric guitar modulation

Tone Character

gain
0
0
warmth
58
55
treble
50
50
bass
52
50
versatility
60
55
EHX Small StoneMXR Phase 90

EHX Small Stone

Pros
  • Rich, warm analog phase character distinct from Phase 90
  • Color switch adds dramatic resonance feedback
  • Very affordable
  • Wide sweep range with smooth, musical movement
Cons
  • Output level can drop when engaged on older versions
  • Color switch interaction requires careful level adjustment
  • Larger enclosure than Phase 90
  • Less consistent quality control than MXR

MXR Phase 90

Pros
  • Simple one-knob operation
  • Iconic tone used on countless classic recordings
  • Script switch on modern versions adds vintage character
  • Phase character is smooth and musical across the Speed range
Cons
  • No depth, mix, resonance, or other controls
  • Fixed phase character that cannot be extensively shaped
  • Less tweakable than multi-knob phasers
  • Script vs block logo character requires internal inspection to identify

When To Choose Each

Choose EHX Small Stone

Players who want a dramatic, pronounced phasing effect for solo playing, psychedelic contexts, or situations where the phaser is the dominant effect — the Small Stone's character is unmissable.

Choose MXR Phase 90

Players who want phasing as a subtle enhancement rather than a primary effect — the Phase 90's moderate character works as a musical texture without occupying the sonic foreground.

Final Verdict — EHX Small Stone vs MXR Phase 90

Best for beginners

EHX Small Stone

EHX Small Stone scores higher on versatility (60/100) and lower on gain (0/100) — a more forgiving starting point than MXR Phase 90.

Best for metal tones

EHX Small Stone

EHX Small Stone leads on gain (0/100) and bass response (52/100) — the two tonal pillars of metal playing.

Best value

EHX Small Stone

At £79 vs £99, EHX Small Stone delivers 20% cost savings. The tonal trade-off is minor.

Specification Summary

EHX Small StoneMXR Phase 90
Price£79£99
CategoryModulationModulation
Gain0/1000/100
Warmth58/10055/100
Treble50/10050/100
Bass52/10050/100
Versatility60/10055/100
Best forRock, blues, psychClassic rock, hard rock
Key artists using EHX Small Stone
Carlos SantanaBjorn UlvaeusDavid Gilmour
Key artists using MXR Phase 90
Eddie Van HalenDavid GilmourSlash

Not sure which to choose?

Use the Rig Builder — tell it your genre, budget and playing style and it will recommend the right gear for you.

Build My Rig →

Related Comparisons

All comparisonsGear alternatives